
A case for uncertainty and playing that we are certain.
Part 1
Descartes once asked himself what we can know for certain. He thought it was the thinking we do, and though that makes some sense, it also raises the question of who or what that “we” is that does the thinking. But “I think, therefore I am” is a useful starting point, because without thinking there would be little reflection and mostly awareness.
But I don’t want to debate Descartes’ philosophy; others are much better at that. I just like the idea of starting your philosophy from something you think is self-evident.
I always wondered how people can be so sure of themselves, or at least pretend to be. I still remember that when I was around 13 or 14, we were sometimes visited by young churchgoers who came to tell us that we did not come from monkeys but that God made us. I did not believe in God*, but that was not because I thought deeply about it, it was just not enforced on me. I do remember wondering how they could be so certain, while I and a lot of other kids in the class were not, or at least not bothered me about it.
I don’t talk to many religious people who take the word of their God seriously, but you don’t have to look far to see that many do. These people also know that there are thousands of different religions, and they must know that many who are as thorough as they are also believe firmly that they are right. You might assume that such knowledge would put some doubt in someone’s mind, but it is clear that it doesn’t.
We humans seem to have a hard time questioning our own beliefs. Is it even possible?
*You can replace the word with another, like your political taste, the football club you support, or your opinion about your neighbor.














