Personal Autonomy
Autonomous agents are self-governing agents. But what is a self-governing agent? Governing oneself is no guarantee that one will have a greater range of options in the future, or the sort of opportunities one most wants to have. Since, moreover, a person can govern herself without being able to appreciate the difference between right and wrong, it seems that an autonomous agent can do something wrong without being to blame for her action. What, then, are the necessary and sufficient features of this self-relation? Philosophers have offered a wide range of competing answers to this question.
Read the rest here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personal-autonomy/
Chatbot
Personal autonomy refers to the capacity and the right of a person to govern their own life. It concerns self-rule: forming intentions, making decisions, and acting on reasons one takes to be one’s own, rather than being controlled by external coercion or internal compulsion.
There are at least three central dimensions.
First, autonomy as independence. This concerns freedom from coercion, manipulation, and domination. If someone is threatened, deceived, or structurally constrained so that meaningful alternatives are blocked, their autonomy is diminished. In political philosophy, this dimension grounds rights and protections against interference.
Second, autonomy as rational self-governance. Here the focus is on the capacity to reflect on one’s desires, values, and beliefs. An autonomous person does not merely act on impulse or habit but can step back and ask whether a desire should guide action. Harry Gordon Frankfurt (1929–2023), in his paper Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person (1971), distinguished between first-order desires (e.g., “I want to smoke”) and second-order desires or volitions (e.g., “I want not to want to smoke,” or “I want my desire to quit to be effective”). On this account, autonomy consists in identifying with certain desires at a higher level and allowing those endorsed desires to govern one’s actions.
Third, autonomy as authenticity. This view, associated with existentialist thinkers such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger, emphasizes owning one’s situation. Human beings are always already shaped by history, language, family, and culture. Autonomy does not mean creating oneself from nothing; it means taking responsibility for one’s condition and choosing within those constraints.
A central tension runs through these accounts. If individuals are deeply shaped by upbringing, culture, and biology, in what sense are they self-governing? One compatibilist answer is that autonomy does not require being uncaused. It requires that actions flow from one’s own internal structure—character, values, and reflective endorsements—even if that structure itself has causes. Baruch Spinoza, for example, argued that people feel free because they are conscious of their actions but ignorant of the causes that determine them; greater autonomy would then consist in understanding those causes rather than imagining independence from them.
In ethics, autonomy underlies concepts such as informed consent, dignity, and moral responsibility. In political theory, it supports liberal commitments to individual rights. At the personal level, it raises a demanding question: are one’s actions guided by reflectively endorsed commitments, or merely by unexamined impulses and inherited scripts?
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Autonomy is an individual’s capacity for self-determination or self-governance. Beyond that, it is a much-contested concept that comes up in a number of different arenas. For example, there is the folk concept of autonomy, which usually operates as an inchoate desire for freedom in some area of one’s life, and which may or may not be connected with the agent’s idea of the moral good. This folk concept of autonomy blurs the distinctions that philosophers draw among personal autonomy, moral autonomy, and political autonomy. Moral autonomy, usually traced back to Kant, is the capacity to deliberate and to give oneself the moral law, rather than merely heeding the injunctions of others. Personal autonomy is the capacity to decide for oneself and pursue a course of action in one’s life, often regardless of any particular moral content. Political autonomy is the property of having one’s decisions respected, honored, and heeded within a political context.
Read the rest here: https://iep.utm.edu/autonomy/
Nochrisis 